Results tagged ‘ Catching Conundrum ’
Guest Post – Catcher Situation and Introducing Ben Siegel
Ben Siegel, one of the few people who actually look at my blog has written up a short analysis of the catching situation, here it is:
According to a report in the Boston Globe on Monday, the Rangers and
Red Sox are still in ongoing discussions about a possible deal for one
of the ranger catchers in exchange for Clay Buccholz. This report
hinted the reason the Rangers brought in Adam Melhuse last week was to
make sure they have a solid backup when Salty or Teagarden is dealt.
The only way a trade would go down right now is if Jason Varitek turns
down a deal worth approximately $5 million and an option for the 2010
season. To me, we need to deal Salty. Either he’s not what he’s
suppose to be or he’s not going to work in Texas. I’d rather see
Teagarden catch because he can play defense which maybe hints the name
Pudge Rodriguez!?
Red Sox are still in ongoing discussions about a possible deal for one
of the ranger catchers in exchange for Clay Buccholz. This report
hinted the reason the Rangers brought in Adam Melhuse last week was to
make sure they have a solid backup when Salty or Teagarden is dealt.
The only way a trade would go down right now is if Jason Varitek turns
down a deal worth approximately $5 million and an option for the 2010
season. To me, we need to deal Salty. Either he’s not what he’s
suppose to be or he’s not going to work in Texas. I’d rather see
Teagarden catch because he can play defense which maybe hints the name
Pudge Rodriguez!?
Ben is 15. Good to have young Ranger fans interested in the game. My response in the comments section. Thanks, Ben, keep the posts coming.
Guest Post – Catcher Situation and Introducing Ben Siegel
Ben Siegel, one of the few people who actually look at my blog has written up a short analysis of the catching situation, here it is:
According to a report in the Boston Globe on Monday, the Rangers and
Red Sox are still in ongoing discussions about a possible deal for one
of the ranger catchers in exchange for Clay Buccholz. This report
hinted the reason the Rangers brought in Adam Melhuse last week was to
make sure they have a solid backup when Salty or Teagarden is dealt.
The only way a trade would go down right now is if Jason Varitek turns
down a deal worth approximately $5 million and an option for the 2010
season. To me, we need to deal Salty. Either he’s not what he’s
suppose to be or he’s not going to work in Texas. I’d rather see
Teagarden catch because he can play defense which maybe hints the name
Pudge Rodriguez!?
Red Sox are still in ongoing discussions about a possible deal for one
of the ranger catchers in exchange for Clay Buccholz. This report
hinted the reason the Rangers brought in Adam Melhuse last week was to
make sure they have a solid backup when Salty or Teagarden is dealt.
The only way a trade would go down right now is if Jason Varitek turns
down a deal worth approximately $5 million and an option for the 2010
season. To me, we need to deal Salty. Either he’s not what he’s
suppose to be or he’s not going to work in Texas. I’d rather see
Teagarden catch because he can play defense which maybe hints the name
Pudge Rodriguez!?
Ben is 15. Good to have young Ranger fans interested in the game. My response in the comments section. Thanks, Ben, keep the posts coming.
mlblogsrangerrumors
Recent Comments